This exchange from Jake Tapper’s blog:
SESSIONS: But do you personally now — I know the president has justified it…
LEAHY: Senator…
SESSIONS: Do you personally have an opinion after all of this whether it was right or wrong?
HOLDER: I think that given all that I have described that what the president did was reasonable.
**
SCHUMER: My colleagues have mentioned them already. I’m not a fan of either the Marc Rich pardon or the FALN. I disagree with your ultimate analysis on FALN — and on Marc Rich, I guess, although you certainly said that was a mistake. I was a critic then, and I’m a critic now. The essential point, though, is that many who have criticized your role in those pardons — Democrat and Republican alike — recognize your entire career and vigorously support your nomination: Jim Comey, Louis Freeh, the Fraternal Order of Police.
So Schumer, who had such a problem with Al Gonzalez’ actions at state and called for his ouster, says that he didn’t like Holder’s handling on the Rich and FALN pardons. But its ok against his other body of work.
H.Y.P.O.C.R.I.C.Y.
Schumer clearly has the interest of his own party before that of integrity at Justice. At least some REP senators seem to be leaning against his confirmation.
Posted under Uncategorized
This post was written by bobsikes on January 16, 2009
Tags: Al Gonzalez, Colleagues, Confirmation, Democrat, Faln, Faln Pardons, Fraternal Order Of Police, Integrity, Jake Tapper, Jim Comey, Leahy, Marc Rich Pardon, Nomination, Ouster, Republican, Schumer, Senator Sessions, Senators, Spite, Ultimate Analysis