An Investors Business Daily editorial spells out the dangerous conundrum we find ourselves in by giving money to Pakistan. It seems that Pak intellligence uses the money to aid the Taliban to inhibit their enemy India. Here’s more:
The plan to reward Islamabad with another $15 billion comes as stunning new U.S. intelligence — gathered from electronic surveillance and trusted informants — reveals Pakistan’s spy service has been supporting the Taliban.
And they’ve been doing it with our intelligence, our weapons and our money. In effect, we are funding the Taliban.
Pakistan’s secret war has pushed violence in Afghanistan to its highest level since U.S.-led forces invaded in 2001. U.S. troop deaths in Afghanistan rose 35% in 2008.
Why would Pakistan’s military intelligence destabilize the Afghan government? To limit archenemy India’s influence next door. It’s now confirmed that the Taliban bombed the Indian Embassy in Kabul with help from Pakistani intelligence, the ISI.
The ISI has even shared intelligence with Lashkar-e-Taiba, the al-Qaida subcontractor that recently massacred 160 people in Mumbai. It’s no coincidence that Indian trains and commercial centers and parliament buildings have been attacked since we drove the Taliban out of Afghanistan.
So, why fund someone to kill our soldiers? To be fair, the Bush administration likley would have followed a similar path. But the path reveals an overreach in the endless talk for talk’s sake of diplomacy. More from IBD:
This confirms what we’ve been warning for a long time: Islamabad is playing a dangerous double game of stringing us along for more and more cash, while mouthing hollow promises of cooperation in our war on terror.
Islamabad aided the Taliban and al-Qaida before 9/11. What made us think Western money could get it to untangle itself from them?
After 9/11, as outlined in official U.S. demands, Pakistan promised to “stop Pakistani volunteers from going into Afghanistan to join the Taliban” and to “end support for the Taliban.”
It has done neither. And our answer is to rush more aid there, under the misguided notion that we can strengthen Pakistan’s social fabric and democracy and walk it away from decades of Islamic extremism.
Washington still doesn’t understand that in Pakistan, terrorism is a state policy. It’s as true today as it was when the Soviet Union occupied Afghanistan. Only difference is, we’re now on the other side of that treachery. To the ISI, we’re the new Soviet Union.
Obama is right to worry that the Afghan government is in peril of falling to the Islamic militants of the Taliban once again. But sending more troops there without also addressing the problem next door in Pakistan is just kicking the can down the road.
The president must at least put verifiable conditions on any aid we send to Islamabad in the future: Cut off support for militant groups, or we’ll cut off the supply of cash.
Otherwise, we’re just letting terrorism pay — and pay big — while bankrolling our own defeat.
The evidence is there that Pakistan is playing us for a fool and a sucker. Eventually a President John McCain would have gotten it, but President Obama is sending money to Pakistan with intell is on the books that says the cash is being used to fund our enemy. Hopefully the check went with clear requirements of the payee.
Posted under Uncategorized
This post was written by bobsikes on March 28, 2009