EDUCATION: Time to focus on family reading when considering reform

A recent meeting with a parent and student was both revealing and typical. The young teenager was having trouble in his classes when it came to reading comprehension. The parent was a college grad and professional person and wanted to have some insight into why his child was lagging.

I asked whether or not the family had the newspaper delivered in the morning?

No.

Do you receive any magazines?

No.

Both parent and child – a father and son in this instance- said they hated to read.

Here’s where it’s typical. I’d imagine colleagues all over the country have had similar meetings and coming to similar conclusions. We are quickly becoming a society that does not read. We play video games, text, watch TV and listen to music piped directly into our ears. If we don’t read, we won’t be any good at comprehending. Ultimately it results in a serious lack of progress in school.

Reform over the last few decades has been focused on schools and teachers. Today’s article by noted education writer Diane Ravitch delves into the problem:

I used to be a strong supporter of school accountability and choice. But in recent years, it became clear to me that these strategies were not working. The federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) program enacted in 2002 did not produce large gains in reading and math. The gains in math were larger before the law was implemented, and the most recent national tests showed that eighth-grade students have made no improvement in reading since 1998. By mandating a utopian goal of 100 percent proficiency, the law encouraged states to lower their standards and make false claims of progress. Worse, the law stigmatized schools that could not meet its unrealistic expectation.

Choice, too, has been disappointing. We now know that choice is no panacea. The districts with the most choice for the longest period — Cleveland and Milwaukee — have seen no improvement in their public schools nor in their choice schools. Charter schools have been compared to regular public schools on the National Assessment of Educational Progress in 2003, 2005, 2007 and 2009, and have never outperformed them. Nationally, only 3 percent of public school students are enrolled in charters, and no one is giving much thought to improving the system that enrolls the other 97 percent.
What this underscores is that both sides of the political spectrum have been long. Democrats have long just advocated for more funding and sided with unions for political reasons. Hasn’t worked. Republicans took on the unions and created high standards and accountability for schools. That hasn’t worked either.

So where do we go now? Ravitch does an outstanding job of crunching the numbers and her conclusions are spot on, but here solutions are just a reshuffle and repackage of what we are doing now. It’s time we as a society reprogram ourselves.

We need to be readers again.

Get the newspaper delivered again and read it while having breakfast. Get a subscription to a magazine in an area your that interests your child – motorcycles, sports, music, skateboards, whatever.

President Obama has proved to be a thoughtful man when it comes to education and I believe that he and his wife care deeply about America’s children. The Obama’s could make a difference immediately if they began advocating that American families start reading again in the home.

We’ve gotten away from being a culture that reads and we badly need to return to one that does.

Share

Posted under Uncategorized

MD/GOP Congressman calls Obamacare “nothing more than government run healthcare”

Guest blogging at Townhall, Rep. John Flemming, MD (LA) joins the wave of those attempting to turn our system into socialized medicine. It is a model Americans know well. And they fear it. The American people do not want the devestation that the Obama plan will bring to their families. Here’s Flemings entire post:

Over the past few weeks, members of Congress and the American people have come to know the details of the Administration’s proposed health care plan. Call it what you like, this proposal is nothing more than government-run health care. As a physician, I am amazed at the number of bureaucrats in this House who are quick to claim a government-run health care plan is the reform this country needs. In response to this, I have offered a resolution that will offer members of Congress an opportunity to put their money where their mouth is, and urge their colleagues who vote for legislation creating a government-run health care plan to lead by example and enroll themselves in the same public plan.

Under the current draft of the Democrat health care legislation, members of Congress are curiously exempt from the government-run health care option, keeping their existing health plans and services on Capitol Hill. If Members of Congress believe so strongly that government-run health care is the best solution for hard working American families, I think it only fitting that Americans see them lead the way. Public servants should always be accountable and responsible for what they are advocating, and I challenge the American people to demand this from their representatives.

You really didn’t think that they were going to play by the rules they assert on you, did you?

Share

Posted under Uncategorized

Sotomayor’s comments rebutted by Hispanic colleagues at same conference

From Rich Lowry via Jennifer Rubin.

Is is that Obama is so naive and race-based in his thought processes that he believes that all Hispanic-Americans feel the same way as Sotomayor. Apparently two Hipspanic judges at the same La Raza conferences immediately took issus with her comments. This will prove to not be helpful in her confirmation.

Share

Posted under Uncategorized

Obama plan has nothing to do with stimulating our economy

$150 million for honeybee insurance? Are you kidding me?

This bill has been all about party building for DEMs by Obama as a thanks for electing him. Clinton tried the same thing.

Hard core GOP nuts like me were willing to give Obama an opportunity to do what’s right for America, but he chose what is best for the DEM party first. He would have won GOP support with federal funds for real “shovel ready” projects, but less than 20% of the bill is even about infrastructure.

So many of the inclusions are about general bugetary items for established federal institutions and programs and should never have been part of a stimulus package to begin with. Considered singulary by GOP legislators, they may have been voted through as legit budget items. So why the anxiousness by DEMs to move through pork barrel spending that have nothing to do with stimulating our economy?

Obama and his DEM colleagues are not stupid and have to know this.
So whats it really about? Eleven DEMs voted against the Pelosi-Obama bill along with all GOP members of the House. Wouldn’t there have been at least one or two GOP pols who would have felt the Pelosi-Obama package would help the economy?

There are no other reasons except those that serve DEM pols and Obama personally.

Share

Posted under Uncategorized

A fascinating look at which DEMs might provide the most problems for Obama

From Politico:

Obama is bound to run into many of the fiefdoms that entrenched DEMs ruthlessly govern mandate from. See the examples of Lee, Waxman, Conyers, et al. He’ll need allies among the GOP and will be willing to cut deals. Obama’s no fool and its one of the reasons he cultivated several conservative commentators at George Will’s home last week. Look for Lindsey Graham and Susan Collins as potential trading partners. McCain’s influence among colleagues appears to be weakening inspite of his intervention today with Cornyn on Clinton’s
Sec State appointment.

Share

Posted under Uncategorized

Schumer, Leahy shoving Holder through in spite of his questionable record at Justice

This exchange from Jake Tapper’s blog:

SESSIONS: But do you personally now — I know the president has justified it…

LEAHY: Senator…

SESSIONS: Do you personally have an opinion after all of this whether it was right or wrong?

HOLDER: I think that given all that I have described that what the president did was reasonable.

**

SCHUMER: My colleagues have mentioned them already. I’m not a fan of either the Marc Rich pardon or the FALN. I disagree with your ultimate analysis on FALN — and on Marc Rich, I guess, although you certainly said that was a mistake. I was a critic then, and I’m a critic now. The essential point, though, is that many who have criticized your role in those pardons — Democrat and Republican alike — recognize your entire career and vigorously support your nomination: Jim Comey, Louis Freeh, the Fraternal Order of Police.

So Schumer, who had such a problem with Al Gonzalez’ actions at state and called for his ouster, says that he didn’t like Holder’s handling on the Rich and FALN pardons. But its ok against his other body of work.

H.Y.P.O.C.R.I.C.Y.

Schumer clearly has the interest of his own party before that of integrity at Justice. At least some REP senators seem to be leaning against his confirmation.

Share

Posted under Uncategorized