So its time to chronicle the thinking of Mets’ brass with respect to Jenrry Mejia. Clearly those whom felt that Jenrry Mejia was best suited as a reliever won. There were not enough naysayers that felt that an upside existed to send him out to make him a starter. The former was correct. Mejia is indeed the club’s future closer and will emerge as Francisco Rodriguez’ set-up man by May.
Now about that rotation.
It doesn’t look good at all. The decision to not acquire talent during the off-season looks to be a poor one. Johan Santana is a given and the Mets committed their money well. He’s a Hall of Famer, but could be a 1970′s version of Steve Charlton if no one else emerges to get outs beyond the first five innings of games.
Thus, the Mets have to end their past formula for winning games which dictates just getting five innings from starters and following it up with three relievers working an inning a piece. Aside from Santana, no other starter has demonstrated the ability to do this. A change in philosophy is in order, but the Mets have not shown any inclination to change.
Perhaps they should ask a few of their current employees who do television about it. Bobby Ojeda and Ron Darling understood their role as a starting pitcher very well. They both started for a club that won a World Series, won two division titles and finished second three other times.
Posted under Uncategorized
This post was written by bobsikes on April 4, 2010
