Obama and Democrat incompetence on display in Honduras

President Obama and his party insisted that America’s standing in the world had diminished under George Bush – that we’d lost our moral compass. However, it is Obama and ultimately his own party which bears the responsibility for their backing of the enemies of America in the Honduran affair. Says the NY Post this morning:


It took a week for President Obama to say something of substance against the violent repression of anti-government protesters in Iran. Fear of meddling, he said, was the reason for the delay.

Yet it took just hours for him to publicly denounce the removal of Honduran President Manuel Zelaya, an ally of Venezuelan America-hater Hugo Chavez, by that nation’s army and demand his immediate reinstatement.

No fear of meddling this time.

That’s because Barack Obama’s foreign policy is very much a moment-to-moment affair, with no guiding principles.

Certainly, President George W. Bush would’ve understood that what has been portrayed as a “banana republic” military coup was nothing of the sort — that Zelaya’s ouster was meant to preserve Honduran democracy, not suppress it.

Zelaya’s removal, after all, came at the direct order of the Honduran Supreme Court and was approved by both the nation’s attorney general and its Congress.

Replacing Zelaya as president was not a military junta but the head of the Congress, a member of Zalaya’s own political party, which had declared him unfit for public office. And the replacement immediately called for new national elections and vowed to abide by the results.

Some coup.

In fact, the monumentally incompetent Zelaya had tried to follow in Chavez’s anti-democratic footsteps, unilaterally overturning Honduras’ constitution by staging an illegal referrendum to give cover to his plan to sidestep strict term limits and run for re-election indefinitely.

When the head of the army refused to cooperate, Zelaya fired him — a move the Supreme Court quickly declared illegal.

Sad to say, international opinion backed Obama and rallied behind Zelaya.

The UN General Assembly called for Zelaya’s reinstatement (which gives a pretty clear indication of just which side holds the high moral ground here).

And the Organization of American States — which just recently moved to readmit Castro’s Cuba after a 47-year suspension — threatened to suspend Honduras’ membership unless Zelaya is reinstated.

Bad enough that Obama doesn’t seem to know when taking sides constitutes irresponsible meddling — and when it doesn’t.

Even worse that when he does choose teams, he chooses the wrong one.

Is it that he just doesn’t understand what’s happening in Honduras or is he siding with Chavez and the Castro brothers? Either is unacceptable. As we’ve not heard anything from Obama or Hillary in the last few days, I hope they’ve realized their folly and are just waiting for the Hondurans to take care of themselves. We’ve not seen any high level meetings between Zelaya and US officials.

Still a better lesson to be learned is by the actions of the UN and OAS. It needs to be clear to to us now just how leftward leaning the organizations have become. Democrats owe an apology to John Bolton for taking them on to protect American interests and those of our allies. Talk about needing a reset button. It only took Obama and the Democrats 5 months to screw up foreign policy.

Share

Posted under Uncategorized

Why Obama is wrong on Iran

From Michael Barone:

Obama is said to be following a realist foreign policy. Don’t worry about human rights; propitiate evil dictators and make deals with them. But if the issue is to avoid a nuclear-armed Iran aiming its weapons at its neighbors, what is realistic? It seems to me Obama is giving up a small but nontrivial chance of advancing regime change for a zero chance of achieving a change in regime behavior. That sounds to me like a rigid adherence to ideology—the ideology in this case being opposition to George W. Bush’s rhetorical and sometimes successful drive to advance democracy and freedom—rather than a pragmatic attempt to take advantage of an unexpected development—the demonstrations against an election result morphing into an existential challenge to an evil regime. From the candidate of hope and change we get a commitment of hopelessness and the status quo. What do all our idealists on the left who cheered candidate Obama and are cheering the Iranian demonstrators think of this?

Is that what Obama is about here – just being against George Bush?

Share

Posted under Uncategorized

The Iranians are serious about this as members of the Revolutionary Guard side with opposition

This report from the Washington Times:

According to the Cyrus News Agency, Tuesday morning 16 senior members of Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps were arrested. “These commanders have been in contact with members of the Iranian army to join the people’s movement,” CNA reports. “Three of the commanders are veterans of Iran-Iraq war. They have been moved to an undisclosed location in East Tehran.” This report has not been confirmed by other sources. If true, it shows that the regime is losing the loyalty of some members of its control appartus, which is necessary if the opposition has any chance of achieving fundamental change. Mass rallies can easily be broken up and revolutions crushed, as we saw at Tiananmen Square in 1989. But if members of the armed forces, police and especially Revolutionary Guards decided to switch sides, then one can begin speaking of revolution.

If indeed significant numbers of Iran’s ‘control apparatus” are looking to side against the Mullahs, it might nit be easy to suppress. One wonders whether or not enough members of the military and police are willing to fire on protestors. It won’t be as easy as it was for the Chinese at Tiennemen Square as they were able to call upom Army Units of a different ethinic origin than the protestors.

While President Obama’s general take on the evil that is the rulling class of Iran, his response is tepid. Contrast his response with that of President George W. Bush made in 2006. From Flopping Aces

Iran is a nation held hostage by a small clerical elite that is isolating and repressing its people, and denying them basic liberties and human rights. The Iranian regime sponsors terrorists and is actively working to expand its influence in the region. (…) as we confront Iran’s nuclear weapons ambitions, we’re also reaching out to the Iranian people to support their desire to be free; to build a free, democratic, and transparent society.

To support the Iranian people’s efforts to win their own freedom, my administration is requesting $75 million in emergency funds to support democracy in Iran. This is more than a fourfold increase over current levels of funding. These new funds will allow us to expand radio and television broadcasts into Iran (…) so Iranians can organize and challenge the repressive policies of the clerical regime(…) By supporting democratic change in Iran, we will hasten the day when the people of Iran can determine their own future and be free to choose their own leaders. Freedom in the Middle East requires freedom for the Iranian people, and America looks forward to the day when our nation can be the closest of friends with a free and democratic Iran.

Share

Posted under Uncategorized

Why the Pelosi lie won’t go away

From James Lewis writing in PJM From Lewis:

We know that during the Bush administration the upper levels of the CIA and the Democrats deliberately set out to poison American public opinion against the president, working day after day for seven long years to destroy his credibility. They received enthusiastic support from Europe, from the corrupt Jacques Chirac in France and the sleazy Gerhardt Schroeder in Berlin. Islamists from Detroit to London and Pakistan supported endless media slanders against the United States. Saudi billionaires presumably bought the European media, just as Saddam bought European influence before the U.S. invasion of Iraq through the oil-for-food scam.

The Left around the world took after George W. Bush and after seven years succeeded in making its accusations stick with about half the American voters. So Obama got elected to the loud hosannas of the Left. No doubt Islamists were delighted to see the GOP defeated as well. Pelosi became speaker of the house on the strength of that campaign.

Pelosi, Democrats, the MSM and Obama are counting on this just going away, but it won’t. No one can tell that big of a lie – not even a Dem icon like Pelosi – and just get away with it.

Share

Posted under Uncategorized

Obama still stonewalling Chicago reporters in pressers

Via Newsbusters:

According to Sun-Times columnist and long-time Chicago journalist, Carol Marin, journalists at Barack Obama news conferences have come to realize that Obama has pre-picked those journalists whom he will allow to ask him questions at the conference and many of them now “don’t even bother raising” their hands to be called upon.

One wonders why journalists are allowing this corralling of the press? Would they have allowed George W. Bush to pre-pick journalists like that? Would they meekly sit by and allow themselves to be systematically ignored, their freedom to ask questions silenced by any Republican? Would journalists so eagerly vie with one another for the favor of Bush like they are Obama’s?

One thing’s consistent from the campaign in that Obama only takes questions from reporters who are in the tank. Its called propoganda boys and girls and it what subversive countries do.

Its still remarkable foreshadowing of things to come if a President cannot take questions from his hometown paper. Its not good any time you deliberately attempt to mislead the American people. good thing Obama and the DEMS have all those psycophants on board in the MSM.

Share

Posted under Uncategorized

POLITICS: Bill Richardson Shameful in His Hit Job Against McCain Over Georgian Conflict

Barack Obama surrogate Bill Richardson shamefully prostituted his foreign policy street cred today by both hitting at John McCain and blamming President Bush for the Russian invasion of Georgia.

New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson said McCain’s campaign “is run by lobbyists that represent Georgia and other countries.”

“He takes huge amounts of money from oil companies that are profiting in the (former) Soviet Union and many parts of the world,” the Democrat told ABC News, attempting to depict a conflict of interest for McCain.

Richardson, a former US ambassador to the United Nations, said the crisis vindicated Obama’s pledge to rebuild US alliances in Europe that were strained under President George W. Bush.

“This has been one of the failures of the Bush administration, failing to build a strong relationship, a mutually beneficial relationship with Russia, so we’d have the kind of influence to persuade them to stop some of these very, very dangerous efforts within their territory,” he said.

Richardson really ought to be embarassed at this awful display of political posturing such a fuid foreign policy and security issue. Georgia is an ally of the US and our other allies whom Richardson spins to suit his own political objectives. Of little matter to Richardson is the fact that Georgia is both a democracy and who’s troops serve alongside US troops in Iraq.

Share

Posted under Uncategorized

Back to the USSR

The Jerusalem Post piece by the same title is chilling in its realistic applications.

This throwback to the heyday of the Soviet Union is more than symbolic. Historical analogies are never perfect, but our sense of déjà vu was acute as we watched Moscow’s Soviet-style move to reassert its domination of the USSR’s former fief.

Moscow perceives a threat to its strategic interests from a small regional actor. It prods its neighboring clients to commit such provocations that the adversary is drawn into military action that “legitimizes” a massive, direct intervention to “defend the victims of aggression.”

Vladimir Putin has proved to be a master spy and has shrewdly kept his true intentions from the world. President George W. Bush is famous to have said he “looked into Putin’s soul,” believing what has turned out to be the exact opposite. While commanding his own country with the iron fist of a Joseph Stalin, he’s co-opted the global design of Leonid Breznev

Share

Posted under Uncategorized

TEXAS Denies Claim from World Court and Signifies Solidarity of American Courts in Execution Case

H/T Lucianne.

- Texas defied the World Court and executed a Mexican national by lethal injection on Tuesday over the objections of the international judicial body and neighboring Mexico.

Jose Medellin, 33, was pronounced dead at 9:57 p.m. CDT in the state’s death chamber in Huntsville, the Texas Department of Criminal Justice said.

He had been condemned for the 1993 rape and murder of 16-year-old Elizabeth Pena in Houston and lost his bid late Tuesday for a last-minute stay from the U.S. Supreme Court.

The World Court last month ordered the U.S. government to “take all measures necessary” to halt the upcoming executions of five Mexicans including Medellin’s on the grounds that they had been deprived of their right to consular services after their arrests.

Medellin’s execution is sure to anger neighboring Mexico and analysts have said it could make life rough for Americans arrested abroad if other countries decide to evoke the U.S. example and deprive them of their right to consular services.

This typically means diplomats will visit and provide legal advice to their nationals being held by authorities.

The Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles had recommended that the state’s Republican governor Rick Perry not grant a temporary reprieve, paving the way for Medellin’s execution.

Texas, which executes far more convicts than any other U.S. state, had taken the view that the brutal nature of Medellin’s crimes rendered him unfit for a reprieve or lesser sentence.

The World Court’s jurisdiction also does not reach Texas, a state where authorities generally don’t like outsiders telling them what to do.

The political fall-out from the Medellin and related cases has reached the White House and the U.S. Supreme Court.

U.S. President George W. Bush directed his native Texas to comply with a World Court ruling in 2004 mandating review of the cases of Medellin and other Mexicans in U.S. prisons awaiting execution. The U.S. Supreme Court said in March Bush’s action had exceeded his authority.

The government of Mexico sent the U.S. State Department a diplomatic note of protest, expressing “its concern for the precedent” that the case “may create for the rights of Mexican nationals who may be detained in that country.”

CHILLING CRIME

The June 1993 crime for which Medellin was condemned was chilling. According to the Texas Attorney General’s office, Pena and her 14-year-old companion, Jennifer Ertman, were walking home when they encountered a gang initiation.

Medellin and his fellow gang members sexually assaulted, beat and strangled the two girls. When their badly decomposed bodies were finally recovered, they could only be identified by dental records. Medellin was only convicted of Pena’s murder.

Speaking to Reuters in the Mexican border town of Nuevo Laredo, Medellin’s aunt Reyna Armendariz, 45, said:

“He was a normal, happy kid … They don’t have the right to take his life away, we acknowledged that he committed a crime but make him pay with a life sentence,” she said.

In his last statement Medellin said: “I am sorry my actions caused pain.” He had no last meal request, which is a ritual of U.S. executions.

Medellin was the fifth inmate executed in Texas so far this year and the 410th put to death since 1982, when the state resumed executions six years after the U.S. Supreme Court reinstated capital punishment.

Texas currently has 14 more executions scheduled for this year and one early in 2009.

Seventeen executions have now been carried out in the United States since the Supreme Court in April lifted an unofficial moratorium on the death penalty when it rejected a challenge to the three-drug cocktail used in most lethal injections.

Share

Posted under Uncategorized