The man who’s case demonstrated to the nation that Sonya Sotomayor is wrong for the nations highest court is to be smeared by Democrat operatives.
People for the American Way is leading the efforts to discredit Ricci. However, the organization is forgetting its core message by attacking Ricci. It’s own mission statement says the following:
Our vision is a vibrantly diverse democratic society in which everyone is treated equally under the law, given the freedom and opportunity to pursue their dreams, and encouraged to participate in our nation’s civic and political life. Our America respects diversity, nurtures creativity and combats hatred and bigotry.
PFAW stand against Ricci reaches howler hypocricy status as it is Ricci who was a victim of Sotomayor’s ruling which kept him from pursuing his dreams. But not to get caught they applied the diversity portion in their press release of June 29:
Supreme Court today ruled 5-4 to overturn the Second Circuit’s decision in Ricci v. DeStefano. The Court’s ruling severely limits the ability of governments and private corporations to create a diverse workforce.
People For the American Way Executive Vice President Marge Baker issued the following statement:
“Anyone looking for more evidence of how conservative the Supreme Court has become will be well served by today’s decision. The Court today seriously undermined Title VII’s protections against acts that may appear harmless on their face but that, in fact, have a discriminatory effect.
“Title VII dramatically improved the diversity of police and fire departments that previously had few, if any, minorities or women. Under the restrictions put in place today, it will be much more difficult for these departments to continue to build a diverse workforce.
“The Court today set a new standard for how states and cities across the country can operate – and in the process exposed conservative cries for ‘judicial restraint’ as utterly hypocritical. It seems conservative legal activists are perfectly happy to have judges rewrite the law as long as they get the result they want. In Ricci, the far right wing of the Court defied Congress’s well thought out design for encouraging diversity and preventing discrimination in favor of its own preferred policy. If the ruling has any upside, it’s that we’ll no longer have to listen to the Right’s cries of ‘judicial activism’ with a straight face.”
So essentially it seems that PFAW’s goal is a perceived diversity over equal opportunity. Nevermind qualifications, ability, the quality of leadership. First and foremost is skin color or gender. A moajority of American long ago decided that this is not the way we want to go as a society, yet PFAW demonstrates here that it is they who are outside mainstream American ideals….or ways if you will.
But there’s more. In the PFAW blog, People for Blog, Drew opins in a post about the witness list for the Sotomayor hearing the following:
Not exactly the kind of person who should be front and center discussing an institution that should be devoted to protecting the rights and liberties of ordinary Americans .
Emphasis mine. I doubt they will be able to get beyond the contradiction in his statement as it was an ordinary American in Frank Ricci whose rights were denied by Sonya Sotomayor.
Posted under Uncategorized
This post was written by bobsikes on July 11, 2009
