We were told that Barack Obama’s trip to the war zone, Israel and Europe would bolster him with voters at home. It didn’t. So here’s why by Obama himself:

Heading home from an overseas trip aimed at strengthening his foreign policy credentials, Sen. Barack Obama said Saturday he’s not counting on an immediate political boost and thinks it’s just as likely he’ll experience a short-term dip in polls simply because he’s been out of the country for nine days.

“The reason that I thought this trip was important was I am convinced that many of the issues that we face at home are not going to be solved as effectively unless we have strong partners abroad,” Obama said, speaking outside 10 Downing Street after his private meeting with Prime Minister Gordon Brown.

Thats rich.

So you were expecting that you would be hurt somehow? Or that it would provide no benefit? Really now?

Then why in sam hill did you go in the first place? Wasn’t it because you wanted to seem more in touch with foreign policy and put voters more at ease? Wouldn’t this have manifested itself in the polling data?

Obama now is averaging more than one gaffe and slip-up dialy. Yesterdays revelation that he called wounded soldiers on the phone after taking the heat for not going was making a mistake and attemping to correct it by making a worse one. Talk about transparent.

Now today he’s saying that they believed the trip wasn’t expected to help politically prior to going. And the day’s not over yet.

H/T: Lucianne Goldberg

Add to Yahoo Add to Google Furl this Add to Spurl Save to Del.icio.us Digg IT! Live Bookmarks! Blogmarks

Maybe: From Newsbusters:

Imagine if a bunch of disgruntled Mitt Romney supporters were currently stalking John McCain or Republican events loudly demanding that their candidate be nominated. Think the national press would be featuring it bigtime as an example of Republican party disunity? Well, the same thing is happening except the people are disgruntled Democrats expressing their opposition of Barack Obama while loudly continuing to support Hillary Clinton. They are known as PUMA (”People United Means Action” or “Party Unity My Ass”). PUMA was formed last month in the aftermath of Hillary Clinton conceding the Democrat nomination to Obama. However, contrary to being just a desperate last gasp by Hillary’s supporters, PUMA activities seem to be surging lately despite the overseas trip by Obama which was widely heralded by the mainstream media. In fact, the official PUMA PAC website has today announced, in a message directed towards Obama campaign strategist David Axelrod, their view that the Obama trip was a “flop”:

Curious. I’ve been wondering what drives this particular movement. Is it just bitter Clinton supporters? Or are there some staunch Dems who really are unhappy with Obama and the manner in which he will have obtained the nomination. Maybe both? And what will happen after the convention? Will they just come home as most Dem talking heads are saying?

Add to Yahoo Add to Google Furl this Add to Spurl Save to Del.icio.us Digg IT! Live Bookmarks! Blogmarks